Re: Slow Data Transfers?
- From: wild bill <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:34:01 -0500
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:58:54 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
<caf@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am evaluating an Ipaq 6515 on Cingular with data plan.
I've been testing with FTP with disappointing results,
slower than dialup.
I thought the data plans were supposed to be much faster.
Hey, Forsberg!
Any word on former MicroCornucopians these days?
re: cellular data
I used to use Sierra 750 and Merlin G100 aircards, both
get 45-70kbits with decent signal quality. Recently upgraded
to Sierra 775, and have seen 170kbits in Edge coverage
areas.
Don't know specifics of Ipaq's; how many 'voice channels'
are they set up to use? One voice channel equals roughly
9.6kbits, the earlier aircards I mentioned use FOUR. And
I'm not sure how the Edge cards get what amounts to the
equivalent of nearly twenty.
I think I've heard Compact Flash sized aircards can
also run Edge - can your Ipaq take one?
Phones are no good for serious data transfer - they are
pretty much limited to one voice channel. One thing I
really like is getting the radar maps, with the power out,
and tornadoes/ hail in the area. (weatherunderground)
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow Data Transfers?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
- Re: Slow Data Transfers?
- References:
- Slow Data Transfers?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
- Slow Data Transfers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow Data Transfers?
- Next by Date: Re: "RadioShack net drops as wireless sales falter"
- Previous by thread: Re: Slow Data Transfers?
- Next by thread: Re: Slow Data Transfers?
- Index(es):