Re: Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- From: John Navas <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:22:24 GMT
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <714n02tgtp1ag5vs96u31bs6gh4e38qiqa@xxxxxxx> on Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:29:09
-0800, Anon E. Moose <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| With BellSouth, AT&T would also have more customers to target for its
| Web access offering as well as planned television services over faster
| fiber-optic lines.
(I thought SBC/AT&T was doing that garbage "Project Lightspeed" over
POTS lines, not fiber optic? If SBC/AT&T truly gets their head out of
their ass, they'd go FTTP like Verizon's FiOS!)
Lightspeed uses fiber-served remote terminals.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- From: Anon E . Moose
- Re: Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- References:
- Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- From: Anon E . Moose
- Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- Prev by Date: Re: ATT Wireless returns - Cingular is history
- Next by Date: Re: Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- Previous by thread: Re: Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- Next by thread: Re: Isn't It Ironic -- Don't Ya Think? Cingular *may infact* become "ATTWS" again!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
