Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: "Scott" <how.do@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:36:58 -0700
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:zwyIf.398444$qk4.202193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <uZidnaF24_x_Hm_enZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on Tue, 14 Feb 2006
18:29:01 -0700, "Scott" <how.do@xxxxxx> wrote:
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BgoIf.395420$qk4.9032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
36.Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the Sales#1. Nice boilerplate stuff, but this doesn't hold up when challenged in
Information and all other documents and policies referenced herein,
represent the entire agreement between you and us, which may only be
amended as described in this Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any
inconsistent or additional representations made to you by any of our
representatives, agents or dealers. ...
court. See the aforementioned Verizon action.
You'll have to be much more specific than that if you want to be taken
seriously.
I was very specific- you were either too lazy to read it or it went over
your head. In either case I'm not responsible for you missing it.
#2. The statement in question has nothing to do with the Service
Agreement.
It had to do with a reference to a statute that does not exist by a
Cingular
employee. Your tiny little mind will not allow you to know that the
reference will ALWAYS supercede the Service Agreement.
It won't, any more than Cingular would be bound to give you (say) 10,000
Anytime minutes just because a salesperson said so. At most you would
have
grounds to invalidate the contract, but not to force specific performance.
Where did I say anything different? Where did I mention forced performance?
(Go look that up before tasting your foot again.)
Sorry- you seem to be the only one here on that diet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: John Navas
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- References:
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: Jeremy
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: John Navas
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: Scott
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: John Navas
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: Scott
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: SMS
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: John Navas
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: Scott
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- From: John Navas
- Re: Adios, Cingular!
- Prev by Date: Re: Cingular is Becoming Arrogant
- Next by Date: Re: Cingular is Becoming Arrogant
- Previous by thread: Re: Adios, Cingular!
- Next by thread: Re: Adios, Cingular!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|