Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: Dr. Ray Batty <anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:37:48 -0800
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:32:36 -0600, Jer <gdunn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Okay. Fine. Tell me that then. What's with all this bullshit about
>not possible?
"Not possible" does not mean impossible to implement. It means
impossible to do at the moment.
>Dr, I'm aware of that. But the message header details are not hidden,
>hence doable.
See above.
.
- References:
- MMS SPAM.
- From: Mo Mo
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: John Navas
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: Jer
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: SAA
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: Jer
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: Dr . Ray Batty
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: Jer
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: Dr . Ray Batty
- Re: MMS SPAM.
- From: Jer
- MMS SPAM.
- Prev by Date: Re: Verizon is best carrier for third year. In SF Bay Area, it's 1-Verizon, 2-T-Mobile, 3-Sprint, 4-Cingular
- Next by Date: Re: 11 Month Rollover
- Previous by thread: Re: MMS SPAM.
- Next by thread: Re: MMS SPAM.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
