Re: 6340i Gate Phone
- From: "cranheim" <caranheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:09:31 GMT
Actually, the phone still works, but the LCD screen is harder to see than
the newer ones. I have seen the screens on the newer phones, and they are
much easier to read, especially in low light. Charles Ranheim.
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
> In <bug6f.1019$8W.358@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Sat, 22 Oct 2005
> GMT, "cranheim" <caranheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>I live in Glastonbury CT and switched to the 6340i gate phone when
>>went with GSM about two years ago. The gate phone was able to receive GSM,
>>TDMA, and Analog. This gave me much better coverage than I could get with
>>GSM only phone. Now, two years later, my two year contract is over, and I
>>can get a new phone. I am afraid I may not get the coverage I now have,
>>especially from my home. Has anyone gone through this experience in
>>Connecticut? Is the GSM alone coverage good? If you find it is OK, what
>>phone do you suggest for best sensitivity in weak areas. Charles Ranheim.
> Why switch? What's wrong with your 6240i?
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- Prev by Date: Re: Adjust ring duration before incoming call goes to voicemail?
- Next by Date: Re: 6340i Gate Phone
- Previous by thread: Re: 6340i Gate Phone
- Next by thread: Re: 6340i Gate Phone