Re: comparing bluetooth cingular phones
- From: "\(ö¿ò\)" <tonymckeehan.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:38:04 GMT
Revised NOkia 6620 Sorry. not 6600
"iamshaun" <iamshaun.1t08xy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:iamshaun.1t08xy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> So it started out switching from AT&T to Cingular. I had the Nokia 3200
> which was probably the best phone I've ever had. Over a year, and never
> had a single problem with it.
>
> Then I switched to Cingular, and got a Motorola V551 - because it was
> Bluetooth enabled. And it sucked. The buttons were unresponsive as
> about all Motorolas I've owned have been, so I switched to the Nokia
> 6230.
>
> Biggest mistake of my life. I found on this forum 'here'
> (http://tinyurl.com/b8ev2) that other people are having the exact same
> issues I am. So now, I'm wanting to try ANOTHER new phone. I researched
> on the Cingular website what they've got as far as Bluetooth enabled
> phones - and have come up with three choices.
>
> Siemens S66
> Audiovox SMT 5600 Smartphone
> Sony Ericsson S710
>
> Anyone have any experiences with any of these three phones, good or
> bad?
>
>
> --
> iamshaun
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cell Phone Forums: http://cellphoneforums.net
> View this thread: http://cellphoneforums.net/t183581.html
>
.
- References:
- comparing bluetooth cingular phones
- From: iamshaun
- comparing bluetooth cingular phones
- Prev by Date: Re: comparing bluetooth cingular phones
- Next by Date: Any chance of keeping my ATTWS phone when I switch to Cingular?
- Previous by thread: Re: comparing bluetooth cingular phones
- Next by thread: FAQ: What's the outgoing SMTP server for Cingular?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
