Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:23:39 -0500
"Hachiroku" <Trueno@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hndijd$mf0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:54:11 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
It all comes down to what you can handle. Talking on the phone is no
different from talking to a passenger in the car. You can talk to
people sitting in the driver's seat, right? (I'm not being a wise ass
here, it's a rhetorical question.)
There's a huge difference between the person on the phone and the person
in the seat next to you. If you can't comprehend the difference....
Talking on the phone is not a lot different from listening to the radio.
I can't comprehend how people make it out to be so difficult.
Actually, it's completely different and all valid research backs this up.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: Hachiroku
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- References:
- Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: ---MIKE---
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: Hachiroku
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: dr_jeff
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: Hachiroku ハチロク
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: Hachiroku ハチロク
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- From: Hachiroku
- Could UA be related to cellphones?
- Prev by Date: Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- Next by Date: Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- Previous by thread: Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- Next by thread: Re: Could UA be related to cellphones?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|