Re: {BS} Limbaugh hits it on the head

"dbu''" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nospam-EA9DF4.04465813082009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <h5vnj6$eva$13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:40:48 -0500, dbu'' <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

In article <4a83578e$0$23783$bbae4d71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Fatter Than Ever Moe <HardTimes@TheFarm> wrote:

Scott in Florida wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:31:48 -0500, Fatter Than Ever Moe
<HardTimes@TheFarm> wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2ud685lrc9b9nu5bvodiorv9jqlgkaa6p1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:16:31 -0400, Hachiroku ????
<Trueno@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

as usual.

Right before a commercial break, in response to a caller holding
the
'party line', Rush said this:

"We need to reform the system we have, not amplify it's
failures."

Yeah, that sums it up just about right. In one sentance.

Rush does that a lot.

What we do NOT need is to replace the best health system in the
world
with the Dims idea....

--

Scott in Florida

But the current health system includes "death panels", and the
current
system allows private insurers to cancel coverage just because
they
feel
like it. Do you think these problems should be fixed?

Yes or no?

Do you think these problems should be fixed?


I think if the health bill doesn't pass the health insurance
companies
are going to raise rates to get the extra 173 million they spent
the
past few weeks trying to defeat the competitive gov't plan. I
don't
think it, I know it. 40,000 registered lobbiest in Washington DC
at
last count but that was a few months ago.
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/08/03/august-ahip/

What would happen if the bill passed?


A lot of people that need health care would get it. Kind of like
public water, public sewage, police and fire services, public streets
and highways, national defense, the list goes on and on. If things
keep
going like they are half the country will be taking care of the other
half's health care. It's not sustainable, yes there will be rationed
health care, there has to be, and it's already here and it's been here
for a long time, it's called ability to afford insurance.
Now tell me why a couple of million dollars should be spent on an
invalid that will never be productive to society?

What about those who have health care and like what they have?

They get to KEEP it and, if they change jobs or lose their job, they get
to
keep it. What part of "THEY CAN KEEP IT IF THEY LIKE IT" don't you
understand?

You the naive little follower? You believe the propaganda, I don't.
--



Who told you otherwise?


.

Relevant Pages