Re: OT POV
- From: "tak" <takirch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:31:55 -0400
"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NbsEk.227$4f2.221@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"tak" <takirch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageI posted it as a demonstration of what you often point out: they won't
news:PLrEk.224$4f2.191@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/nextgenvets
I shall now predict the response you'll get from the Legion of Retards
here:
"That was staged, and why so few of those veterans?"
Interviews with soldiers who support Bush are not staged, though.
accept anything critical of their view as a credible source and offer
anything and everything they can find as proof positive of their viewpoint.
Just a review of their desperate plight as they try to put "lipstick on a
pig" referring of course to the McCain campaign. While I haven't looked yet,
I'm sure you could list the complainers almost in 123... order. ;-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT POV
- From: tak
- Re: OT POV
- References:
- OT POV
- From: tak
- Re: OT POV
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- OT POV
- Prev by Date: Re: {OT} Here is Nanci P...why the vote failed!
- Next by Date: Re: OT POV
- Previous by thread: Re: OT POV
- Next by thread: Re: OT POV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|