Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jan 2008 04:14:54 GMT
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:479175a7$0$47129$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
What aspects of the war on terror would you credit with the fact
that we have not been attacked here since 9/11?
You are becoming quite boring with your leading questions. Why
don't you just make a statement and let it stand on its own merits?
That's not a leading question. One possible aspect is the presence of
our troops in Iraq. There are others. You're so well informed. You
must know what they are. If not, have you no imagination?
You're the most well-informed person here as evidenced by your double
amount of postings over anyone else. What are the other possible
aspects according to you?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- References:
- {OT} war on war is lost
- From: badgolferman
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: badgolferman
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: badgolferman
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: badgolferman
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: badgolferman
- Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- {OT} war on war is lost
- Prev by Date: Re: PU Auto trans question
- Next by Date: Re: Wiper Blade Replacement
- Previous by thread: Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- Next by thread: Re: {OT} war on war is lost
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|