Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- From: Scott in Florida <Justtofakeoutliberals@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:01:38 GMT
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 17:57:01 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The fact remains if a small car hits another small car, their properly
belted passengers are more likely to die as well, compared to the same
collision in a larger vehicle. One can not defy the laws of physics. Take
a trip through a bone yard and see for yourself. You of course are free to
believe whatever you chose, as for me I would never take the chance of being
caught dead in a small or midget car just to save a relative few dollar a
year on fuel ;)
mike
Didn't you say you had a Pinto?
--
Scott in Florida
About all I can say for the United States Senate
is that it opens with a prayer and
closes with an investigation.
Will Rogers (1879 - 1935)
.
- References:
- Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- From: Mike Hunter
- Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- From: Jeff
- Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- From: Mike Hunter
- Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- Prev by Date: Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- Next by Date: Re: OT Florida Power and Light offer...
- Previous by thread: Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- Next by thread: Re: MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
