Re: Rush nails liberalism yet again.

Even better, I have a NYT staffer living in my basement and he typed it for
me. ;-)

No need to get your panties in knot. The comedy in the irony of Chuck's
post was inescapable.


"Roadrunner NG" <RRNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:465ecf2d$0$16701$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Did the NYT tell you to say that? The dominant liberal mainstream media
(establishment) has a far deeper following of programmable people that
Rush could ever hope for. That's why the liberals in congress are trying
to shut down any view other than theirs, calling it the "fairness
doctrine". They may get away with the FD because conservative media does
not hide their bias like the liberal dominant media, thus not requiring
opposing views to be present (which is the way the left want's it). Dan
Blather was a perfect example of a leftie hiding his bias. Trouble was, he
couldn't hold back the hatred any more and got carried away.

I know, it's Bush's fault


"Truckdude" <shrub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ous7i.65708$UD2.51338@xxxxxxxxxxx

"n5hsr" <n5hsr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D6idnTm2mK7umsPbnZ2dnUVZ_r2onZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Conservatism is difficult because it takes thought, application, time
and enerty to understand it. It's not harder because it doesn't make as
much sense as liberalism, it's the exact opposite: conservatism is an
intelectual pursuit."

He also noted that liberalism is a feel-good religion, as it were.

Guess he nailed JSB, (F)Art and all the rest.

Charles of Schaumburg

So you know that you are an intelectual because you listen to Rush
Limbaugh and he told you so?? ROFL!!





.

Relevant Pages