Re: Global Warming


"mark_digital©" <XXX-976@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DZKdnWO1P4FGCLDbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Jeff" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gFaXh.8281$Fs6.4924@xxxxxxxxxxx

"mark_digital©" <XXX-976@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TvydnY-2GuuIqbDbnZ2dnUVZ_q2pnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"DH" <dh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:462cc0d3$0$16263$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns991B5E737559DFredGarvin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In message news:462ca0c7$1$20193$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DH sprach
forth the following:
We are not experiencing those stronger winds.

In other words, "Go Mavs" made his point. The Earth and Mars are
warming
for different reasons.

Uh, no. Wind, like evaporation, is a cooling action. Go back to your
third grade physics class.

Uh, no. Wind accelerates heat transfer for a variety of reasons. It
is not intrinsically heating or cooling. Repeat kindergarten and try
again.

In other words, "Go Mavs" made his point. The Earth and Mars, having
entirely different atmospheric systems, are warming for different
reasons, to the surprise of no one excep those who, for political
reasons, require Earth and Mars to be warming for the same reason.

By the way, climatologists aren't stupid, don't think in lockstep,
aren't engaged in a conspiracy and don't like to overlook things,
although for political reasons many people profess to believe that they
are stupid, do think in lockstep, are engaged in conspiracy and do
overlook things, and climatologist have looked at solar radiation flux
and are fairly certain that solar radiation flux is reponsible for
about 1/10 of the warming that's attributable to increased greenhouse
gasses (the figures were something like 1.6 watts/m**2 vs .16
watts/m**2). Yes, they DO look for alternative explanations and work to
understand what the data tells them, unlike those who have arrived at
conclusions first and then would like to fit the facts to meet the
required conclusions.
Footnote: An atmosphere, even as thin as Mars, must have something in
it's atmosphere to create high and low pressure (wind is an attempt at
equilibrium). Something as simple as a shadow can be enough. Since Mars
does revolve, it has a shadow and different terrain makes for variable
type winds.

Yeah, but it rotation is more improtant. It takes about 1.9 years for it
revolve once around the sun, about about 25 hours for it to rotate once
on its axis.

What we do know, and we are made aware for the past few New Years Eves,
is that Earth's rotation around the sun is slowing. Mar's rotation could
be slowing too.

Rotation is when it travels around an axis, like a fan or the wheels on a
bicycle.

Revolution is when it travels around something, like the earth around the
sun or the moon around the earth.

Sorry, i don't mean to be a pain, but, I like to use vocabulary
correctly.

A one second or two second difference may not seem much over a span of
one year. But that's due to our perspective of life and our life cycle.
A while back there was a rare occurrence of all the planets lining up.
If we can accept the idea that we can't see planets in other solar
systems but we know the possibility is there because the star's seem to
be pulled by the gravitational pull of it's planets, then is it safe to
say a full line-up as I mentioned earlier would have an effect not only
on our sun but on the individual planet's on each other?

The gravitational effects when the planets line up would be rather small.

When Voyager was flung with the help of Jupiter, it was estimated to
have caused Jupiter to have lost one-quarter of an inch in a trillion
years concerning either it's rotation on it's axis or rotation around
the sun. Energy transferred but considered a benign human interference.

Gee, the sun will blow up in a few billion years. I doubt I will live to
measure it!

Jeff

You're not being a pain.

If it takes an additional 2 seconds to complete one revolution around the
Sun, this can be interpreted as Earth's orbit has decayed. The mean
distance Earth is from the Sun is approximately 93 million miles. Or
should I say, was 93 million miles.


I'm tired. Forgive me. It's been a long day. *Decayed* was the wrong word.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Global Warming
    ... no. Wind accelerates heat transfer for a variety of reasons. ... The Earth and Mars, having ... is that Earth's rotation around the sun is slowing. ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)
  • Why be a believer?
    ... > SECOND the Universe is incomprehensible in size and by comparison our World ... > Sun, Stars and Planets revolved around the Earth. ... > Acoran [Supreme] ...
    (alt.religion.christian)
  • COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES
    ... Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon ... Sirius A and B which are only 8.5 light years away. ... star of 1.5 earth diameters orbiting 20 earth distances from Sirius A. ... IS GLOBAL WARMING A REALITY? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Vangas predictions for this world...
    ... began making predictions when she was 16 years old. ... Will start as a normal war, ... 2100 - Man made Sun is lighting up the dark side of the planet Earth. ...
    (soc.culture.indonesia)
  • Vangas predictions for this world...
    ... began making predictions when she was 16 years old. ... Will start as a normal war, ... 2100 - Man made Sun is lighting up the dark side of the planet Earth. ...
    (soc.culture.indonesia)
Loading