Re: [OT] their way or no way

Charles @ Kankakee wrote:
> "Josh" <anony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:8VednWXNRbnLgPneUSdV9g@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:oa6dnVMtAclDcv7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "Bassplayer12" <perettij@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:yGR8f.116121$Ph4.3557200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Some of you say Islam is the religion of peace. Here is yet
>>>>>> another example of their peaceful intentions. If you think this
>>>>>> can't happen in America, think again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah and you'd probably say Christianity is a religion of peace.
>>>>> Check out Iraq sometime.
>>>>> Guess we're showing 'em how it's done eh?
>>>>
>>>> Did GW declare war in the name of Christianity?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, he basically declared war on the basis of ignored UN
>>> resolutions. . . . Maybe we ought to ban the UN?
>>
>> Wrong, he claimed it a Crusade.
>>
>>
>
> Come on Joshie, you've been hitting the Kommunist Kool-Aid again. He
> basically refused to comply with the UN resolutions. Klintoon mostly
> ignored his bad behaviour. When GW tried to bring him to honor the
> 91 Cease Fire agreements which he signed, he at first played hide the
> weapons, then kicked the inspectors out altogether. We should have
> taken care of him in 91. He was a boil on the buttocks of the world that
> should have been
> lanced a long time ago. As are you.
>
> When the UN wimped out and refused to enforce its own resolutions,
> because the palm was getting greased, a la Chicago style, Bush had to
> make it over into a crusade, but the underlying reasons haven't
> changed.

Oil.


.

Quantcast