Re: [OT] their way or no way


"Josh" <anony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8VednWXNRbnLgPneUSdV9g@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Charles @ Kankakee" <n5hsr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:oa6dnVMtAclDcv7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Bassplayer12" <perettij@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:yGR8f.116121$Ph4.3557200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> Some of you say Islam is the religion of peace. Here is yet another
>> >>> example of their peaceful intentions. If you think this can't happen
>> >>> in America, think again.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah and you'd probably say Christianity is a religion of peace. Check
>> >> out Iraq sometime.
>> >> Guess we're showing 'em how it's done eh?
>> >
>> > Did GW declare war in the name of Christianity?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Nope, he basically declared war on the basis of ignored UN resolutions. .
> .
>> . Maybe we ought to ban the UN?
>
> Wrong, he claimed it a Crusade.
>
>

Come on Joshie, you've been hitting the Kommunist Kool-Aid again. He
basically refused to comply with the UN resolutions. Klintoon mostly
ignored his bad behaviour. When GW tried to bring him to honor the 91 Cease
Fire agreements which he signed, he at first played hide the weapons, then
kicked the inspectors out altogether. We should have taken care of him in
91. He was a boil on the buttocks of the world that should have been lanced
a long time ago. As are you.

When the UN wimped out and refused to enforce its own resolutions, because
the palm was getting greased, a la Chicago style, Bush had to make it over
into a crusade, but the underlying reasons haven't changed.

Charles


.

Quantcast