Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: DCA <dca860MAPS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:56:41 GMT
Not true. Performance is what I wanted to know about (rather than E markings).The E number is not of concern to me - but obviously poor functionality is of concern. E numbers mean the bulb manufacturer has gone through an expensive type approval routine. Non-E number means its compliance cannot be verified NOT that it does not comply with requirements!
Sigh. The manufacturers would love to be able to E mark their
replacements. They would sell far more. They *can't* be E marked because
they can't meet the spec.
Instead of arguing just buy them and do your own tests. But by the tone of
your posts you don't give a damn if they are effective or not for the job
but simply want them for fashion reasons.
I guess the answer is exactly as you say - have a go and see. If performance is significantly compromised then they will be in the bin
.
- References:
- Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: DCA
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: DCA
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: DCA
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: RustYŠ
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: R. Mark Clayton
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: DCA
- Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- Prev by Date: Re: 325xi sport package, suspension?
- Next by Date: Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- Next by thread: Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?
- Index(es):