Re: How To Build A HHO Generator

Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
Aw, c'mon...

I have converted base metals into gold and built a perpetual motion machine...

DAS

To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---
<trader4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:cbb9a069-7d96-435a-808e-554a42260763@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[...]

The amount of energy that goes into making stainless steel has
absolutely nothing to do with this. But simple high school chemistry
does. It takes energy to break the two hydrogen atoms away from the
oxygen atom in water. This energy is supplied by the electric
current via the alternator. And when you later recombine the
hydrogen with the oxygen by burning it, you get back EXACTLY the same
amount of energy that it took to seperate it. This is a classic
experiment performed in high school chemistry. In addition, there
are losses to due the combustion process not being perfect, heat loss,
friction, etc, so the net result is it takes MORE energy to seperate
the hydrogen/oxygen than you get back from it.

In other words, this is nonsense, not far removed from the urban
legend of the miracle 100 MPG carburator or magic pills that turn
water into gasoline. There is a small amount of truth to adding
some hydrogen to an internal combustion engine. Some experimental
engines have been modified to use small amounts of hydrogen which then
allow a slightly leaner fuel mixture to still burn. Besides just
getting some hydrogen in there, I believe they also modified other
parts of the engine, ie the fuel air mixture via computer controls,
etc. After all that, they got a few percent improvement in actual
mileage

Scammers have taken that faint bit of truth and are using it to
seperate people from their money with silly claims of doubling
mileage, etc by electrolysis of water.

[...]

Do you know all the details of the combustion process? and no it's not
just a simple equation like: CH4 + 2 02 --> CO2 + 2 H20 + heat energy.

If the tiny amount of H2 could react with another chemical in the combustion chamber to produce an additional exothermic chemical reaction, then it is possible that this process could make a contribution to the usual combustion. Can you prove that it's not possible?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How Rockets Differ From Jets
    ... >to have 'X amount of energy', ... With regards to spaceplane wings or perhaps that of one massive ... The composites of what basalt fibers and basalt microballoons as having ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: Amazing New Air Car - Its NOT About the Air!
    ... although a one cycle internal combustion engine that's running on h2o2 ... IC engine"? ... spare/surplus terawatts (unrelated to fossil or nuclear energy) would ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: OT. A self powered Radio, Do anyone remember Popular Science Article?
    ... the amount of energy that "a small amount of Radium" releases is ... Radium was used in much higher quantities then than it was until Tritium ... there were basically two options for radio detection - ...
    (misc.rural)
  • Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
    ... This is the minimum amount of momentum flux ... For a given amount of absorbed momentum flux there is a definite ... corresponding amount of kinetic energy, ... make this calculation we find that matter must be absorbing energy at ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What does Plancks constant really mean?
    ... > amount of energy difference between any frequencices. ... The formula does not place any quantization limits on ... This means that a photon is moving around a point of origin at the ...
    (sci.physics)