Re: Diesel prices



trader4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


So, the Saudis split their oil revenue 50-50 with Exxon? According
to whom? Reference please.


Check out the history of ARAMCO. It's a 50/50 split







"In many ways the recent rise in gasoline prices reflects the fuel
playing a bit of catch-up to oil, which has been above $85 for more
than four months, said Ken Medlock a research fellow at Rice
University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. Based on the historic
price relationship between crude oil and gasoline, Medlock said,
retail gasoline should be priced closer to $3.63 per gallon if oil
remains at $100."


That's about where prices are right now. Clearly not that far out of
line. And oil is a worldwide commodity, with production relatively
fixed and worldwide demand from countries like China and India
growing.




The denials didn't hit the news
for about a week, however, and in the meantime, the futures market bid
oil up over $100 per barrel based upon the "uncertainty of supply"
because of the comments of Chavez that he actually had not made.


Welcome to how free markets work. Of course they react to news.
They reacted when OPEC, which BTW Venezuela is a member of, stated
they would not increase production. They reacted when it looked like
Venezuela might get into military conflict with Columbia. They react
when a refinery catches fire or a hurricane heads for the Gulf of
Mexico.

Yes they react with astounding efficiency at the chance to raise prices but seldom are so assiduous about passing on savings to consumers.



Then when the Chavez speech where he denied the comments finally broke
through the iron curtain and got in our media, the media started a
story that OPEC was probably going to cut its output at its upcoming
meeting in May, which conveniently coincided with the futures market
decisions, and, again a story that was a pure speculative fabrication,
sending oil to its current record levels.


The story of possibly reducing the target below that of Q4 was
reported by multiple news organizations and was based on OPEC
SOURCES. What do you expect reporters to do? BTW, if OPEC wanted
to deny the story or increase the quotas, they are free to do so.
What is this a worldwide conspiracy? Let's see, it's Exxon, Saudi
Arabia, the media which can range from NY Times to Fox news, wall
street, .... who else is in on this big conspiracy?


Now the money to pay for roads and schools and health care (which, by
the way, is the most expensive in the world in the U.S.), has to come
from somewhere. There is no free lunch, as the capitalists like to
say, so when a citizen in Germany or England pays taxes at the pump,
it replaces taxes or other expenditures that have to come from
somewhere. In other words, we pay for our low gasoline prices in
bumpy roads and collapsing bridges and lack of health care, etc.

Spoken like a true liberal that see higher taxes as the solution to
all of life's problems.



When we spend money on things using borrowed money at the Federal
level that money also has to come from somewhere. It comes from the
same people who are not paying their fair share in taxes.

Here in NJ federal and state income taxes top out currently at 44%.
Social security taxes take another 13%, split between the employer and
employee. We have a 7% sales tax. I pay 10,000 a year in property
taxes on a 3200 sq ft house. So, tell us, how much more money do
you want to take to fix problems. Want to go back to 70% federal
rate, like we had in the 70's and the economy that went with it?




That> increases the National Debt, which means that more and more of
the tax
money taken out of the wages of working people goes straight into the
bank accounts of the same rich people who have had their taxes cut.


Taxes were cut at all levels. It's a blatant lie that they only went
to the rich. The top 1% of incomes pay 39% of all the federal income
tax. The top 5% pay 60%. Guess how much the bottom 50% paid? A
whopping 3%.

Now there's something to be proud of. Look at the numbers a different way; the top 10% control 72% of the wealth leaving 28% for the majority 90%. Now even if you're at the top of that bottom 50% you mentioned that pays only a piddling 3% of the revenue, your income for a family of four is $40,000. Not much left to pay taxes on, is there? And that's at the TOP of that bottom 50%. The way I see it the rich aren't paying proportionately to their wealth

BTW, in 1980, when the top fed rate was 70%, guess how much of all
income tax the top 1% paid? Answer: 19% That's right. With today's
rate that is close to half of what it was in 1980, the highest income
folks pay twice what they did back then.

The class warfare argument that you're making goes like this. Guy A
pays 30,000 in income tax. Guy B pays 3,000. So, we give everyone
a 10% tax cut. Now, A pays 27,000 and B pays 2,700. Guys like you
try to maintain it's unfair, because the cuts are only percentage wise
equal, and both guys didn't get a $2700 cut.

Try that argument next time your in a store when they have a 10% off
sale. But a $10 item and tell them you want the same discount that
the guy who pays $100 for something gets. Tell them you should get
your item for free.


Your argument only works in a flat tax situation







they have to get the money somewhere, and the only place
is from people who have money, the rich, so then the rich get back
interest payments on the money they should have been paying in taxes
in the first place, raising the taxes on you and me and just about
everybody else. (Most people are not rich and have no chance of
becoming so.)

As if the "rich" are the only ones investing in US govt securities.
US debt is widely held by people across the board, around the world.
Bond funds that little investors are in own them. Individuals own
them through savings bonds. Institutions around the world own them
as do foreign central banks.

Do a little research. I think you'll find that that top 10% is far more heavily invested on a per capita basis. Never mind the idiocy of selling so much debt to the Chinese that they could sink our enonomy with a mass sell off.


When we pay more at the pump it all goes to Exxon/Mobile and their
executives and stockholders so they have more money to lend the
Federal Government so we can pay them even more in interest on their
money.

You really do sound like Hugo Chavez. Maybe even worse. The biggest
contributor to the cost of oil is crude. Sure Exxon is making money
on the oil they produce themselves from wells they paid to drill.
But that doesn't equate to the lions share of the money we are paying
for gas going into Exxon's pocket.


How else do you explain the absolutely obscene level of profits they reported this year? With an administration so heavily vested in the oil industry don't you think it's a little strange that we can build a Ford Ranger turbodiesel pickup that gets 30mpg in the US that you can't buy on these shores? Who stands to gain the most by high fuel consumption? Both the oil companies and the government would lose billions in revenue if CAFE standards were in place.



Wake up people. The common man is getting completely screwed under
this system and will continue to get reamed out as long as the current
mass ignorance of what is actually happening continues!


Yep, keep railing against a system you don;t even understand. Try
taking an economics course or two.

How about a course in economic history. You might find that wars and revolutions are nearly never about ideology but about money. This from my PhD SIL who teaches economics at Georgetown.

JD
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Diesel prices
    ... capitalist oil corporations in cooperation with their OPEC partners. ... When the Saudis split 50-50 with Exxon, which is what the deal is, do ... say, so when a citizen in Germany or England pays taxes at the pump, ... When we spend money on things using borrowed money at the Federal ...
    (alt.auto.mercedes)
  • Re: Inflation? Thats not inflation....
    ... The storekeeper keeps 95 cents. ... taxes don't generally work that way; ... I was following the money. ... The employee then pays what's left as rent for his apartment. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: Administrations new tax proposal
    ... Contractor one. ... Pays his taxes. ... Part of the extra money goes to ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: Anyone had firsthand experience with Panniculitis/lymphoedema?
    ... Well, it has occurred to me that as the money I'm getting from Oz isn't trackable by the IRS, I could get away with not paying taxes on it. ... I have looked at a bunch of pages on offshoring and its definition and while some may say it is automatically any business shipped overseas....in almost every instance the mention of LOWER COST LABOR is mentioned. ... I'm not trying to say I'm not offshoring in a sense, because I am with it leaving the borders, but she pays U.S. taxes on the 1099 I send her and she pays Swedish taxes on the same money. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: These Hypocrisies are NOT the Christians problem
    ... pays a good chunk of his income in taxes while the CEO ... The IRS likes its money. ...
    (alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots)