Re: Question about software that will send a return receipt.

On Aug 8, 1:55 pm, Onideus Mad Hatter <use...@backwater-
productions.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:09:14 -0700 (PDT), ctops_legal





<ctops.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 7, 11:50 pm, "[     DocJeff     ]" <y2kp...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:58:11 -0700 (PDT), ctops_legal

<ctops.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Web bugs are evil but most especially when they're in email. Don't do
this!

/Doc - shame on you!

Well you see in my state emails are considered public record,
attorneys, and other goverment officials wont return an email because
there public record, so when you send these people evidence via email
in court they say well we never got said evidence, that's why this
software is very important understand it can't be a web bug, or any
dangerous programs that will damage goverment servers or computer
systems or you will be committing a felony,

A web bug is neither dangerous nor destructive. It's a link to a 1x1
transparent image, often a .GIF file. Most people wouldn't even notice
that it's in the email but as soon as their email program requests
that image file, your web server (let's say Apache) logs the
time/date/IP of the request. That would be enough to show that the
email was received and, probably, viewed.

certan software, thanks for the response anyways Doc.

Google for web bugs  or certified email. You'll find what I'm talking
about. :)

/Doc - and I still say it's not cool to use that stuff.

Yea Doc the problem is my rar, zip files contain Word documents,
scaned documents ect., all evidence these items have to be password
protected via zip or rar, see my problem, as far as google these is
nothing like this, I guess it could be a custom deal as long as it
don't damage the target computer.

                                                         ctops.legal

Uh, just because they GOT it doesn't mean that they READ any of it.
Even if you could derive some way of, say via a word Macro virus to
send a flag to a server saying it was opened/accessed, that STILL
doesn't mean that they read it, they could have simply closed it right
out and then deleted it.  Not that it really matters anyway, no one
would be obligated to read anything you send them, regardless of the
circumstances...I'm thinking maybe you've misunderstood something and
what you want to do, which quite frankly makes no sense, is based upon
that miscomprehension.  It sounds like you need to hire a lawyer and
stop trying to DIY yer own court case...which if I'm not mistake
involves some kind of pedophilia accusations against you.  If that is
the case and you do try to DIY...yeah...yer gonna go to jail for a
*VERY* looooong time...and you don't even want to KNOW what they do to
convicted sex offenders in prison...you'll be lucky if you can still
walk and talk by the time you get released.

 --

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹http://www.backwater-productions.nethttp://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog

Hatter Quotes
-------------
"Don't ever *** with someone who has more creativity than you do."

"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."

"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."

"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."

"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."

"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the *** up!"

"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."

"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."

"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."

"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"

"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."

"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."

"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."

"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."

"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."

"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."

"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."

"Those who record history are those who control history."

"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."

"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."

"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"

"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."

"Is my .sig delimiter broken?  Really?  You're sure?  Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!"    `, )- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well thanks for the response Mr. Hater, oops Hatter, first see there's
a thing called service to all parties in litigation, proof of service
to be more precise see it don't matter if they read it but when a
lawyer testifies in court there was no "service via email" and you
sent the email to the email address listed on there state bar listing
as required by all state laws for active attorneys you know they got
the email unless there server returns it, this software would show
they committed perjury in court which wont get a layer arrested but
will win over the other parties argument every time, the reason I post
here is because some people here have intelligent IT and software
development skills, it's no secret I am working on a novel internet
case and I am dealing with dumb corrupt officials that rely on a
corrupt pre-fixed judicial system to make there prosecutions, see
http://www.jail4judges.org/ , a good sign of a person's intelligence
is demonstrated where the lack of experience in discussions as in your
comment "It sounds like you need to hire a lawyer and stop trying to
DIY yer own court case...which if I'm not mistake involves some kind
of pedophilia accusations against you" the interesting word you used
is "pedophilia", this term you just used sir defines your
"intelligence".

Definitions of intelligence:

*the ability to comprehend; to understand and profit from experience.
*secret information about an enemy (or potential enemy).
*news: information about recent and important events.
*the operation of gathering information about an enemy.

Do you think all law enforcement are totally honest?
Do you think lawyers never lie to there clients or have there own
agenda?
Do you think judges are always impartial?

I am disappointed in your response obliviously you have no experience
in matters of which the topic of this discussion is pertaining to.

ctops.legal


.