Re: Browser Test

Mimic wrote:
oeb wrote:
-=Biscuit=- wrote:
PerfectReign <theperfectreign@xxxxxxxxx> delighted us to no end
by taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
news:wxn0rrtjpckd$.1me7d9tugz9zl.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx, on the hallowed
day of Mon 24 Apr 2006 02:25:29p:
Just heard about this service - haven't tried it. Thought I'd
give you all a heads up if you want...

http://www.browsercam.com/default.aspx

...it is a bit pricey, but might be worth the trouble for
testing your site in different browsers without having to setup
virtual machines.

I believe Jenn had posted that link a while back (though nothing's wrong with posting it again). As I remember, they have an initial 24 hour free trial.



Hello Mara, LTNS

There is also http://www.snugtech.com/safaritest/ which will give you a screenshot of your site in safari for free.


There is also another community based one I found somewhere. You submit a URL and people submit their screenshots. It took time though, and I have lost the URL anyway =P


Ian

Ah that one I could do with, Mac testing is a bit of a hassle for me

This is the crazy thing. I went to site the other day with Safari on my mac and it told me I couldn't access their site without IE. So I fired up IE and went to the site (there is IE for macs but it's not as good as Safari) and it worked fine. Today I went back to the site but with safari spoofing the user agent as IE 6 and the site worked just fine. Why in the hell would some stupid web designer only design for IE and actually bar all others from entering? I can understand if they are just lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, but to actually bar non-IE users is plain stupid.


--
If English was good enough for Jesus
It's good enough for Texas.
-Texas proverb :-)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Browser Test
    ... I went to site the other day with Safari on my mac and it told me I couldn't access their site without IE. So I fired up IE and went to the site and it worked fine. ... I can understand if they are just lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, but to actually bar non-IE users is plain stupid. ...
    (alt.2600)
  • Re: Browser Test
    ... Ah that one I could do with, Mac testing is a bit of a hassle for me ... I went to site the other day with Safari on my ... lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, ... bar non-IE users is plain stupid. ...
    (alt.2600)
  • Re: Browser Test
    ... Ah that one I could do with, Mac testing is a bit of a hassle for me ... I went to site the other day with Safari on my ... lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, ... bar non-IE users is plain stupid. ...
    (alt.2600)
  • Re: "Its a Safari problem"
    ... If Safari is the culprit then the best thing would be to leave the site ... I don't know enough about javascript to be able to say the site's code ... iCab 3 shows the 'AJAX wIndows' just fine, ... Serious problem with this design though: the size of the 'AJAX window' ...
    (comp.sys.mac.apps)
  • Re: Javascript framework performance
    ... In the buggy Safari versions, both the popup and the window containing ... Safari 2.x- was down the degradation path completely then there would ... It's make or break at the design ... That's another reason I dislike general-purpose libraries as ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)