Re: Browser Test

On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:23:03 +0100, oeb wrote:

Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
Mimic wrote:
oeb wrote:
-=Biscuit=- wrote:
PerfectReign <theperfectreign@xxxxxxxxx> delighted us to no end
by taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
news:wxn0rrtjpckd$.1me7d9tugz9zl.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx, on the hallowed
day of Mon 24 Apr 2006 02:25:29p:
Just heard about this service - haven't tried it. Thought I'd
give you all a heads up if you want...

http://www.browsercam.com/default.aspx

...it is a bit pricey, but might be worth the trouble for
testing your site in different browsers without having to setup
virtual machines.

I believe Jenn had posted that link a while back (though nothing's
wrong with posting it again). As I remember, they have an initial 24
hour free trial.



Hello Mara, LTNS

There is also http://www.snugtech.com/safaritest/ which will give you
a screenshot of your site in safari for free.


There is also another community based one I found somewhere. You
submit a URL and people submit their screenshots. It took time
though, and I have lost the URL anyway =P


Ian

Ah that one I could do with, Mac testing is a bit of a hassle for me

This is the crazy thing. I went to site the other day with Safari on my
mac and it told me I couldn't access their site without IE. So I fired
up IE and went to the site (there is IE for macs but it's not as good as
Safari) and it worked fine. Today I went back to the site but with
safari spoofing the user agent as IE 6 and the site worked just fine.
Why in the hell would some stupid web designer only design for IE and
actually bar all others from entering? I can understand if they are just
lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, but to actually
bar non-IE users is plain stupid.




Yes, I have seen it happen. I think the best explination for it is that
some people are idiots.

IIRC for a while Microsoft would server a DIFFRENT broken version of
their site to FF users. As in diffrent HTML was served out. (Don't hold
me to this, but I think it was a few years back).

I think its funny that people block the people that are NOT using the
broken browser that makes sites render incorectly.

Though I'm just getting back into managing a group using .net as a
platform, IIRC, ASP.NET sites are supposed to serve one level of
functinality to IE6 browsers and degrade gracefully to IE5/Netscape
browsers.

I'll let you know when we move forward.

--
k
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Browser Test
    ... Ah that one I could do with, Mac testing is a bit of a hassle for me ... I went to site the other day with Safari on my ... lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, ...
    (alt.2600)
  • Re: Browser Test
    ... Ah that one I could do with, Mac testing is a bit of a hassle for me ... I went to site the other day with Safari on my ... lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, ...
    (alt.2600)
  • Re: Buttons & CSS
    ... What does the fact that you're using a Mac have to do with this? ... whining on about the fact that one of my sites used not to work in browsers ... it's very frustrating ... I care not a whit about CSS-colored buttons in Safari ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: Most widely used browser(s) for Apple/Macintosh?
    ... for Apple/Macintosh and what percentage of the Mac market do they have? ... Safari and Firefox (handy extensions and ad ... browsers with small shares. ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)
  • Re: Browser Test
    ... I went to site the other day with Safari on my mac and it told me I couldn't access their site without IE. So I fired up IE and went to the site and it worked fine. ... I can understand if they are just lazy and can't be bothered to design for other browsers, but to actually bar non-IE users is plain stupid. ... What's Apple Talk? ...
    (alt.2600)