Re: I always delete my email but I was wondering..



On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:02:14 -0700, Bitey, after pondering on life, the
Universe and everything, checking the Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy
we now know to be Usenet, decided to scribble :
> Hans van Eynsbergen wrote this gem. Seriously... :
>
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:35:33 -0700, Bitey, after pondering on life, the
>> Universe and everything, checking the Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy
>> we now know to be Usenet, decided to scribble :
>>> What do you use if you want to backup all your email on a regular basis?
>>> Copy and paste? Put it in a separate folder? Use a program to do it for
>>> you?
>>
>> Why bother deleting your mail ?
>
> It goes way back to when I was a newbie and a virus was going around in
> the newsgroup I was a reg in at the time. The virus would grab your email
> contacts out of your address book and send itself to your friends. It
> didn't happen to me because I didn't use one -still don't- and because I
> have always deleted my email. Also because in the event I ever get hacked
> no one will ever be able to read my private email. It's all about
> protecting the privacy of the people who email me. Needless to say (I
> think) I have a totally different for email than I do for newsgroups and
> think anyone who posts private email with headers and without permission
> is a slimeball and never to be trusted again.
>
>> I just delete
> the unimportant messages and archive by sender or subject.
>> I make daily back-ups from my HD on a daily basis on a 40/80 gig Quantum
>> DLT tape drive.
>
> May I ask WHY you backup your email?

No specific reason, I just back up my complete HD's.
>>
>> I've still got all my mail since day one ! I do delete attachments like
>> pics etc, cause they often take up to much space. Yup, I like my
>> archives !
>
> Do you ever go back and read the archived email? I can't think of anything
> I would use an email archive for other than blackmail. lol

Regularly. It's like I remember someone send me something about a given
subject. Or discussions that ended a month ago and I want to take up
again for some reason. Or having requested something from someone and
still did not get an answer. Many reasons why I re-read mail.

You and many of the other regs don't have to worry at all about getting
your privacy invaded in whatever way !
Like all of you have explained so many times that with a few certain
ground rules, ones privacy is protected for 99 % !
I guess 100 % is impossible.


--
Hans van Eynsbergen

There is an art to flying, or rather a knack...
This knack lies in learning to throw yourself
at the ground and miss...
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How do you write?
    ... Peter Knutsen (usenet) wrote: ... that if ONE chapter file gets corrupted for any reason that's ONE ... chapter I have to re-do, ... But I usually have a paper copy, because I scribble ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: RAID 1
    ... >> repeated context that also clutters the archives, ... I suppose I should have given up on usenet ... he didn't have google to help sift through the cruft and probably ... It shows parts of your 100 most recent posts with links to the full text ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Vanity Googling for fun
    ... Every usenet server has "permission to copy" my ... been published elsewhere, I would be certain of winning, as both the law ... Usenet archives, and making usenet archives publically available (thru ... newsgroup posts, while just as illegal, seem to be ignored by courts. ...
    (alt.marketing.online.ebay)
  • Re: BEWARE: GOOGLES CENSORSHIP: BEWARE (of censorship!)
    ... makes the usenet so preciously fucking hilarious.....ahahaha ... I can see why you need total access to these archives because ... > the UK to access the two aforecited articles: ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: BEWARE: GOOGLES CENSORSHIP: BEWARE (of censorship!)
    ... makes the usenet so preciously fucking hilarious.....ahahaha ... I can see why you need total access to these archives because ... > the UK to access the two aforecited articles: ...
    (sci.physics)