Re: The deathlaunch was successful!
- From: Me <no-address_for_spammers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:54:39 -0400
On 26 Jul 2005 23:31:58 +0200, ThePsyko <ThePsyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>On 26 Jul 2005 in alt.2600, ByteCoder <me@xxxxxxxx> made their
>contribution to mankind by stating in news:Xns969FEECE35E1CBCfromHolland@
>213.75.12.135:
>
>> Mutex Zuhälter <mutex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> 1122407917.9e89c72f507b6e2afb2c6128170de169@teranews:">news:1122407917.9e89c72f507b6e2afb2c6128170de169@teranews:
>>
>>> Is it just me, or does everybody else also think the shuttle program
>>> is a piece of junk that needs to be scrapped and replaced with
>>> something newer and better?
>>>
>>> At least there were no hitches. Or were there?
>>>
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/07/26/space.shuttle/index.html
>>
>> I think it should. Old piece of crap.
>>
>
>Maybe they should replace it with this?
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4561282035
Darn... If I'd have seen that I'd have bought it in a minute, LOL.
.
- References:
- The deathlaunch was successful!
- From: Mutex Zuhälter
- Re: The deathlaunch was successful!
- From: ThePsyko
- The deathlaunch was successful!
- Prev by Date: Re: The deathlaunch was successful!
- Next by Date: mhkoch321@aol.com and bergkoch8@aol.com
- Previous by thread: Re: The deathlaunch was successful!
- Next by thread: Re: The deathlaunch was successful!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|